Thursday 15 March 2012

Hansard of the Legislative Council

PREMIER’S ADDRESS

Mr FINCH (Rosevears) - Madam President, how do you read Tasmania's current position? We are not in a very good state. That is the state of the State, isn't it, we are in a bit of a mess. So we are throwing jobs out the window faster than we are creating them. Suddenly we have a budget problem that seemingly could not have been foreseen. Well, why not? I am not an economist, Madam President, and thank goodness for that. But surely a drop in GST and other revenues could have been foreseen some years ago.

Mr Hall - It was.

Mr FINCH - They were, in 2008 other signals were there.

Ms Forrest - Well, the GFC was already hitting then; the GFC was already well known then.

Mr FINCH - Yes, so why do Tasmanians -

Mr Parkinson - I didn't hear you talking about them in 2008.

Ms Forrest - I did, the Treasurer did.

Mr FINCH - When you are ready.

Madam PRESIDENT - Thank you, the member for Rosevears has the Floor.

Members interjecting.

Mr FINCH - So the question I have, why do Tasmanians, as taxpayers, pay for economists in Treasury and Government if they cannot plan for an obvious future downturn in revenue, and do it well?

Ms Forrest - Well, they did, but then they took the handbrake off when the election was on -

Mr FINCH - Yes, that is right. So you know, why has it suddenly become apparent to Treasury and the Government that Tasmania is in a financial mess, and that nurses and other qualified people have to be thrown on the scrap heap? Why could not this situation have been dealt with gradually, more gradually? Do our Treasury and government leaders go into denial until the last minute? Surely, Madam President, we pay economic advisers to look ahead, even if it is only for a financial year or two, and advise government accordingly. So I know it is hard to be an economist, and I indicated my aversion to the role earlier, but I cannot help thinking that those highly paid economists and recipients of their advice have let the Tasmanian people down.

Any household, Madam President, can just look ahead for a few months or even years. They can assess future income and expenditure, as we have to do, and you have to plan accordingly, do not live beyond your means. Then the normal household can reduce spending over a long period in a sustainable way which then causes, for the family, minimum harm. It seems our State Government cannot do that. If you can see your income is going to be lower over the next few years, well you immediately cut expenditure, not bury your head in the sand until the situation is so dire that you have to start selling off the family home. It seems the Tasmanian Government does not have that simple domestic skill. However, Madam President, be that as it may, we are in a situation where jobs in health and other areas are being cut. It is a simple economic fact that when someone loses their job, they also lose their ability to spend. This in turn further depresses our economy and does not impress the likes of Gerry Harvey.

Madam President, every job that is lost may save the wages bill but ultimately that will weaken our economy. Other types of efficiencies may be another matter.

Gross domestic product - GDP - figures released earlier this month made for depressing reading. Australia's economic growth in the December quarter slowed to just 0.4 per cent. State figures indicated that both Tasmania and South Australia were in recession and Victoria was on the brink of one. However, this, while academic, is debatable because State figures do not necessarily indicate the definition of a recession. Economist Saul Eslake explained this in an article in Tuesday morning's Examiner. I know that others have quoted Saul Eslake and how handy it is to have that overall assessment of how we are going in Tasmania and to have his keen interest in what we are doing in this State. This is a quote that I took from it; it is quite a long one but it does explain, in his words, the situation:

'Many commentators look, in order to determine whether an economy is in a recession, to see whether there have been two or more consecutive quarters of negative growth in the volume of goods and services produced - that is, in what (for a nation as a whole) is called real gross domestic product or GDP.

Unfortunately, the Australian Bureau of Statistics produces state-based estimates of real GDP (which it calls 'gross state product' or GSP) for financial years only.'

That is where it complicates things.

'Hence, we can't use this rule of thumb to ascertain whether Tasmania (or any other state) is in recession.

The bureau does publish, along with its quarterly estimates of GDP for Australia as a whole (such as were released last Wednesday for the December quarter of 2011), estimates of what it calls 'state final demand', which is the sum of spending by households, businesses and governments (including government-owned businesses) in each state.

Although those estimates, by definition, don't include interstate or international trade, some commentators say that a state economy is in recession if this measure of state final demand declines in real terms or two or more quarters in a row.'

We hear about that so often. Probably the member for Murchison goes through that from time to time. That is not in Saul Eslake's writings.

Members laughing.

Ms Forrest - I'm not surprised it's not in his writing.

Mr FINCH -

'By this partial yardstick, Tasmania's economy isn't in recession, because although Tasmania did experience two declines in state final demand last year, they were in the June and December quarters, with a (quite large) increase in the September quarter in between.

That is, there haven't been consecutive quarters of negative growth in Tasmanian state final demand.'

That is the quote from Saul Eslake. It may not be a technical recession, Madam President, but it feels like one.

Ms Forrest - Through you, Madam President - I would like to quote the next bit that he said when he uses a measure that he has devised looking at the employment figures and participation rates. According to that measure that he is providing around that, he said that Tasmania is in recession. So, it depends - whether we are or not, it is certainly very challenging.

Mr FINCH - Yes. I would not want to be an economist.

News reports last week blamed the high interest rates and government spending cuts. Yes, obviously cutting government spending slows economic growth and, in Tasmania, it is contributing to a recession. However, if government revenue drops, so must spending, and the immediate future is looking grim. At the same time as the poor GDP figures were released last week, Treasury secretary, Martin Parkinson, revealed that Federal and State revenues are now in crisis with tax collections down by 4 per cent of GDP, almost $60 billion a year, and unlikely to return to former levels for many years to come, we heard from the Premier this morning.

Ms Rattray - Likely to be a decade.

Mr FINCH - Likely to be a decade, but Mr Parkinson warned of more pain ahead, saying:

'For both levels of government surpluses are likely to remain, at best, razor thin without deliberate efforts to significantly increase revenue or reduce expenditure'.

Madam President, the State Government has now been warned if it was not already. It may be a utopian concept and I might be economically na�ve but I cannot help thinking that we are failing to manage our economy properly.

The State Budget - let us hope things will look better on 17 May, but things are also dire in the private sector of course. Just looking across the Tamar from my electorate to the member for Windermere's area, we have Temco on the brink, Rio Tinto Alcan or Bell Bay Aluminium, as I think it has been rebadged, looking unviable in the future and even if the pulp mill was built it would only create a small proportion of those threatened jobs in the long term. Of course there are construction jobs and all that would go to boost the economy that that would bring, but in the long term there will not be that many jobs.

Ms Forrest - That's why we need a diverse economy, isn't it? We can't rely on one thing. Whether it's a pulp mill or whatever, you can't rely on one thing.

Mr FINCH - Absolutely. Of course threatened job losses also apply on my side of the river. The Beaconsfield Gold Mine is expected to lose 150 jobs by the end of June and that mine which has been going on and off for more than 100 years is unlikely to ever open again. That is the reading, whatever happens to the price of gold.

Ms Forrest - The gold price is pretty good at the moment and if the mine isn't profitable now it's unlikely to get better.

Mr FINCH - No, there is a sense that all the remaining viable ore has already been extracted, so you are fiddling around with the fiddly bits, if you know what I mean.

Mr Mulder - Otherwise known as small people's gold.

Mr FINCH - I am no economist or miner.

Mr Hall - Through you, Madam President - with regard to your comments on the pulp mill, even though I think you said it would only create a small amount of jobs, obviously it would create a large amount of jobs in construction, but not in the mill itself. The actual harvesting and all the ancillary jobs would be quite considerable.

Mr FINCH - Yes, point taken. I did not feel I had to say that, but thank you very much.

As far as Temco and Bell Bay Aluminium are concerned, Madam President, when did it make sense really to bring raw materials from thousands of kilometres away, process them with cheap electricity and then export them a further many thousands of kilometres away?

Mr Hall - You said cheap electricity?

Mr FINCH - Cheap electricity at the time. It does not make as much sense now, particularly with transport logistics and increasing costs of transportation. Do not mention the war.

Ms Forrest - There's only one other thing you're not allowed to mention.

Mr FINCH - It has always made better sense to use our electricity to value-add to our own raw materials or to sell our power, and of course that leaves the argument for another Bass Strait power cable. While on the subject of selling power across Bass Strait that idea of a water pipeline to Victoria has emerged again. I am pleased to see that the State Government is keeping an open mind about that. Evidently, the suggestion is that we would only be selling fresh water which would flow into Bass Strait after power generation. That is a suggestion at this time. It will be interesting to follow that.

Mr Mulder - We already have a pipeline that is supposed to be having gas and there's not much of that coming down.

Ms Rattray - Stop the gas and use the water.

Mr FINCH - There is another idea, Madam President. The ideas just flow. Throw one out there and see what comes back.

Ms Forrest - Through you, Madam President - I would suggest that before we put water over the other side of the water we are talking about we should get a second Basslink cable first.

Mr FINCH - Yes. I did not realise I was going to workshop this speech but it is good. I like it.

Mr Mulder - This is innovative thinking.

Mr FINCH - Yes, you can send a lot of water through a 6 metre diameter water pipe that goes across to the mainland. From my reading of it, I have not researched -

Ms Forrest - Six metre?

Mr FINCH - Or was it six millimetres?

Members laughing.

Mr FINCH - I know you have told me a million times not to exaggerate, but please. A big pipe can send a lot of water across to the mainland. I have not done extensive research -

Mr Mulder - That is obvious.

Mr FINCH - What we hear and what we see with scant viewing on television about water generally the issues are getting, I suppose, worse on the mainland.

Mrs Taylor - By crikey there is no shortage of water on the mainland at the moment.

Mr FINCH - Not at the moment, no, but the peaks and troughs, and as we move further into climate change and the effects of that we do not know what is going to happen. We have a fair idea that water is going to be - like we used to hear when we were young people - it is liquid gold and it is becoming more so.

Just looking further into our present economic situation, it worries me greatly and I am sure it worries all honourable members of the House, that about one-third of all Tasmanians are on some form of welfare. It is also worrying that other States resent the fact that Tasmania receives back considerably more GST revenue that we actually generate. I was really taken aback by the Western Australian Premier.

Ms Forrest - They have short memories.

Mr FINCH - Absolutely. I won't go down that path too far, but I just thought that that was unnecessary and it did not help our relations at all.

Mr Mulder - Another thing is that the subsidies that their manufacturing industries get in those States is a subsidy to those States that non-manufacturing States like us don't.

Mr FINCH - It would have been much better if he just sat on top of the totem pole and kept his mouth shut. I will look on the bright side of things now.

The Premier's Address last Tuesday was worthy, but for me not very inspiring. There was not a great deal about concrete job creation policies and as T.S. Eliot once said, 'If you have a big problem set up a committee,' but in this case there will be a white paper. I am not knocking that idea but most Tasmanians would prefer something a little more concrete than a white paper.

Mr Mulder - Chlorine-bleached white paper.

Mr FINCH - Thank you. There wasn't really anything new in the talk of the Asian century. That started in 2000 or even earlier.

Mr Hall - That was Paul Keating.

Mr FINCH - It has been around a long time.

Mrs Taylor - But the century started in 2000.

Mr FINCH - Mind you, I did make a point earlier by way of interjection when I said that in listening to the discussion with Simon Crean, Bill Kelty and Lindsay Fox we were hearing about the projections for the future, only scant details, but one of those that resonated with me was the growth in people who want to have middle-class values, or were going to develop middle-class values and there will be three billion extra by 2030.

Ms Forrest - In China.

Mr FINCH - It is actually China-India, that area. But three billion with middle-class values.

Ms Forrest - They will want more protein to eat, so we need more milk, more meat and everything else.

Mr FINCH - Let us keep an open mind on it. The markets are there for some of Tasmania's great products, but there are tremendous difficulties, the main one appears to be freight. If you can land a shipping container in Sydney from almost anywhere in the world for much less than one from Tasmania there is a problem that has to be addressed now. But the Premier's September trade mission is encouraging and is a good idea. Tasmania has a lot going for it, as the Premier said, in dairy, aquaculture, wine, mining and more, and of course forestry as well.

[5.00 p.m.]

A few weeks ago I had a meeting with a couple of stalwarts of the sawmilling and transport industries, Fred Ralph and Ed Vincent. They were optimistic about the new products from plantation timber like the laminated structural beams, but they were pessimistic about the resources for smaller sawmillers from State forests. They both agreed that the industry needed drastically restructuring although they both said not along the lines of the present IGA. That is economics. There are many other concerns and one of them that I have been personally worried about for a long time is about the ostentatious carrying of weapons by police. I have spoken to, I think, every police minister, probably the last seven or eight, about this very subject. What prompted me was one time in Melbourne I was walking up towards Russell Street and I was behind a very young police officer - he looked about 18 - and the main feature of this young officer was this huge gun that was on his hip. It was a Glock.

Mr Mulder - A big what?

Mr FINCH - A big Glock. He was heading up toward Russell Street and I was walking behind him and I was getting a sense that he was going to the OK corral. He flexed his shoulders and it worried me because I was thinking to myself -

Ms Forrest - How can you tell he was 18 if you were walking behind him?

Mr FINCH - You can tell. The little skinny neck that we all once had.

Members laughing.

Mr FINCH - The little frame, you know what I mean, the little skinny wrists.

Mr Mulder - How could you tell how old he was if you could not see for his Glock?

Mr FINCH - A good observation by a police officer. In my own mind I started to talk about why a police officer needed to carry such a big gun and how mature is this young fellow to handle circumstances where he might need to use a gun. Would there ever in his career come a time when walking down the street he would need to draw his gun in defence of himself or to shoot someone. They are interesting questions. When I look at Australia the rates of classification for most crimes have been dropping since 2001. I am led to believe, and I might be corrected here, Tasmania has the lowest crime rates in the world.

Dr Goodwin - In the world?

Mr FINCH - If you read the paper, you have been reading too much of what happens in the Press.

Dr Goodwin - I do not think we have the lowest crime rates in the world.

Mr FINCH - Look, you told me a million times not too exaggerate and I think that I am on the right track here.

Ms Forrest - What about Singapore?

Mr FINCH - Okay, I will move on. But we have a good police service. Our police officers are generally dedicated and very caring members of our community but I do think that it is provocative to carry nine millimetre semi-automatic weapons so openly. I understand the arguments -

Mr Mulder - How much brighter would the future of the State be if policemen did not have guns?

Mr FINCH - Let me continue and talk about that alternative that has come up in Victoria. It just worries me. We heard a few days ago our State Government has rejected calls for police officers to be equipped with taser guns. In Victoria police have tested the weapon for a year and they have now decided to make it standard issue.

Mr Mulder - In addition to the Glock.

Mr FINCH - Yes, but it is a good step in the right direction.

Mr Mulder - Add more weaponry and frighten you even more.

Mr FINCH - Also rather than being here going to the OK corral he could be on the 3.10 to Yuma trying to get on the train.

Madam PRESIDENT - You understand the television cameras are on.

Mr Mulder - I am sure that you will probably see some of it tomorrow.

Mr FINCH - Acting Police Association President, Robbie Dunne, said that there had been three police shootings in Tasmania in the past 18 months and tasers would give police an alternative to a firearm. Others I have talked to are exercising their minds, not saying they are overly enthusiastic about this, but they are sort of saying yes, it could be a circumstance that we could go to in Tasmania that will give us that situation where you do not have a gun that can blow people apart but you have a weapon that enables you to stop somebody.

Mr Mulder - Weld them together with the electric current.

Mr FINCH - You have a weapon to stop people rather than inflict the damage that a Glock or these semi-automatic weapons will do.

Mr Mulder - By way of interjection, Madam President, and I was invited to - are you suggesting that contrary to all the other States you've mentioned, we would actually replace Glock pistols with taser guns?

Mr FINCH - Yes, that would be my idea, yes.

Dr Goodwin - Particularly for the little, tiny officers that are very young.

Mr Mulder - He hasn't seen the weight of the battery that powers the -

Mr FINCH - I remember as a young person growing up in Hobart that we had an understanding that police officers had access to guns when they went about their duties. I remember up at the Fern Tree hotel I knew that the local copper who came every time we had trouble at the pub either had a concealed gun, and I think he had an ankle strap, or it was in the glove box of his car. If things did take a turn for the worse, things that he could not handle, he did have a weapon.

Members interjecting.

Mr FINCH - If he beat the miscreants out to the car he could then protect himself.

Ms Forrest - Or the stoush was in the car park to start with.

Mr FINCH - Yes, but I know I am making light of this.

Mr Parkinson - I actually agree with most of what you say.

Mr FINCH - Look, we need to do something to counter as well the so-called death-by-cop syndrome. Now, that seems to be prevalent in Victoria, and it occurs elsewhere.

Mr Parkinson - The London bobbies did without guns for many years and I think they still do.

Mr FINCH - Absolutely, yes.

Mr Parkinson - They have special squads over there to carry guns.

Mr FINCH - But this death-by-cop syndrome is not just about the victims of police shootings, there is collateral damage all around, particularly for officers involved. You might remember in the Northcote Shopping Plaza several years ago not only did a disturbed teenager die, but three dedicated police officers were traumatised, and probably for the rest of their careers. That is just something I would like to put on the table. I have already suggested to the chair of committee B that it is something that we might ruminate over and see whether there is something that we might lend to this argument. I do get a sense that that might be something substantial that we could bring to the Police minister's considerations on this. I think he has said no to tasers, but I still think that it is compelling evidence from Victoria in particular, which from all impressions that we get is a very dangerous place to be for police officers.

Ms Forrest - In Victoria do they have tasers and guns?

Mr FINCH - I am sorry, I do not know, but they are issuing tasers. I would imagine initially they will probably do the two. If you have a taser and you can stop somebody who is going to physically harm you, I think that that is sufficient.

Mr Parkinson - There was a program on television the other night that you probably saw.

Mr FINCH - No.

Mr Parkinson - One in Sydney where the policewoman shot this mentally disturbed fellow, and while aiming the pistol at him she screamed at the top of her voice, 'Taser, taser, taser'. She was totally off her face herself, she didn't know what she was doing, she thought she was using a taser, probably. It was incredible.

Mr FINCH - Yes. And that is all about providing the equipment and providing the training. They are the areas that I wanted to talk on.

Madam President, a really bright spot for my electorate last week was when Legana-based McDermott's Coaches signed an agreement with a national coach tour company, Scenic Tours Pty Ltd, to deliver all Scenic and Evergreen touring programs in Tasmania and on the mainland. This new program will go to Uluru, Darwin, Broome and Perth, and cover the West Australian wildflower season, as well as 25 Tasmanian tour departures. I know that they have bought two new luxury coaches, touring coaches, for their existing fleet of over - now, this is Legana, just up the West Tamar - they have 40 vehicles.

We went for a press conference there the other day and I asked if they could bring a bus out. The buses were all out, they were all being used. You might remember we had quite a debate about the Cradle Mountain bus service that went over quite a period of time. All reports coming back to me are that McDermott's operation and their drivers are exemplary. People who appreciate it give a lot of really positive feedback about that operation. Company director, Peter McDermott, has outstanding professionalism that concentrates on customer service and that is why his 55 staff that he employs now are the main reason for the company's success nationally.

Mr Hall - That is good to hear because we have had a few negatives up there for a while.

Mr FINCH - Absolutely. That is why I suggested to Peter that he should really tell people about this because there are so many negatives in the tourism industry, and warranted as well, but people also need to know the new stories.

Ms Forrest - The 25 Tasmanian departures, are they 25 tours around Tasmania?

Mr FINCH - Yes.

Ms Forrest - Not leaving Tasmania and going to the mainland?

Mr FINCH - No, but there might be a tour booked for the mainland that might feature Tasmanians; he provides the buses and the drivers over there; they hop on the bus and away they go. But they are ostensibly with the umbilical cord back to the Legana operation. I might just go on, Madam President:

'The Legislative Councillor for Rosevears, Kerry Finch, says he is proud of the success of the company based in his electorate.'

I wrote that press release.

Members laughing.

Mr FINCH - Anyway, it is time for me to go. You are giving me a withering look, Madam President.

[5.11 p.m.]

Mrs ARMITAGE (Launceston) - I am sure you will all be pleased that I certainly will not speak for very long. I think everything has been said.

Madam President, I rise to comment on the Premier's state of the State address and, as I say, I will not go over areas covered by other members in any great detail.

As the Premier states, though, Australians are worried about what the future holds for their jobs and their families. Unemployment is a major concern and, as mentioned by the honourable member for Windermere, just weeks ago BHP Temco announced, and we hope it is temporary, the suspension of three months of their smelter at Bell Bay. The future of the former Rio Tinto now Bell Bay Aluminium is certainly uncertain as well. This has major implications for the whole region and the State as a whole because the tentacles spread far and wide with many feeling the effects. I have recently heard that some stores in George Town have already seen a downturn in trade because of the uncertainty, and obviously lack of work spreads to contractors in the port and so on.

Just looking at the Examiner while sitting and listening to the honourable member for Rosevears, I see that 45 more jobs at Aurora are being cut from Rocherlea, Burnie, Devonport and Cambridge because there is simply not enough work. It says:

'The economic downturn in Tasmania has resulted in a reduction in the amount of customer-generated work that we do.

It is the third round of job cuts in the distribution business and is on top of 228 employees cut from across the company in 19 months.'

And obviously Aurora will be one that will suffer if George Town and Temco and Rio Tinto -

Mr Finch - Through you, Madam President - I remember years ago when Telecom decided to relocate out of Launceston, there were 160 jobs lost and they took so many community volunteers that went with the jobs - the mothers and the fathers who contributed -

Mrs ARMITAGE - They do. And the schools; everyone suffers.

Mr Finch - Sporting organisations, the kids who were involved in sport; sporting teams were decimated. So it has a big impact right through the community.

Mrs ARMITAGE - Absolutely. It is not simply the worker, it is the related family.

As has already been stated, Tasmania has special difficulties not faced by other States, mainly because of Bass Strait, not to mention the port licensing fee for use of port facilities at any of Victoria's main ports. As previously pointed out by David O'Byrne, the tax will add around $75 million to the cost of our exports to the mainland. As the smallest State we will bear a disproportionate share of this tax. Our shippers, as we know, have little choice but to use the Port of Melbourne and we will be hit hard.

The Premier mentioned forestry and the transition the industry is undergoing. I believe we must support all our workers both in the forests and other areas. Life is all about finding the right balance. Forestry, mining, agriculture, aquaculture, tourism, retail and the list goes on; they are all dependent upon each other. In my electorate of Launceston there are many people affected by the forestry issues and concerns at Bell Bay, be they workers or families of workers. As mentioned previously, unemployment is a major concern to everyone. It is all very well to have Big W and big-box developments but we should also be endeavouring to keep the feel of our society. To that end we need to support our mum-and-dad corner stores, our local industries and businesses. These are the cornerstones of our local economies and they make Tasmania a desirable place, not just to exist but to live.

I was reading, and I am sure you have all received this from the Tasmanian Small Business Council, their media release on Tuesday 6 March where they said:

'Figures released today by the Sensis Business Index highlight the difficulty Tasmanian small and medium businesses have with a minority government �

Despite sales and profitability improving, activity for most businesses surveyed is still below par and have a long way to go before business owners have a smile on their face.

Although the Business Index's indication of business confidence remaining steady, the decrease in employment must demonstrate that a number of businesses are not confident of maintaining their current sales and profitability level�

The report continues to highlight the ongoing dissatisfaction by business people to the Labor Green minority government. The reasons given, one of which was 'government being manipulated by the Greens' suggests that the dissatisfaction currently felt will not change until there is an election. This doesn't bode well for the Tasmanian community given that one is not due until 2014.'

That was a release by Robert Mallett, the Executive Officer of the Tasmanian Small Business Council.

Just briefly touching on my own electorate of Launceston, there are many developers actually looking at working in Launceston at the moment, including the C.H. Smith building work, which is valued at an estimated $35 million. This derelict building has sat empty for so many years and is one of the gateways to Launceston. It is really refreshing to see it proceeding in the near future. There is also the redevelopment of the Roberts building, which is another estimated $2 million and the Kings Meadows Shopping Area development, which is estimated at $35 million. So in Launceston certainly things are looking a little brighter in the development stages.

One of the fastest growing residential areas in the Launceston electorate is Hadspen, a delightful township on the banks of the South Esk River. The Meander Valley Council has started designing the infrastructure needed to double the population of Hadspen over the next two decades. Of course it shares my electorate borders with -

Mr Hall - Indeed, that new subdivision will become South Hadspen.

Mrs ARMITAGE - Right. They are currently looking at around a 20-year blueprint that will guide the sustainable development of Hadspen, taking into account the full range of community, economic and environmental considerations. The design will include all the amenities to support a population of around 4 000 people and this will include health facilities, shops and a school. It is really good to see that they are thinking of a school as well.

I think that one of the things that is nice to see is the community are behind this and have been involved with consultants working closely with the Hadspen community through workshops and meetings to learn what the residents actually want. A survey is also on a dedicated project website.

Prospect in my electorate is another area seeing substantial growth with housing. So there are some real positives, which are very healthy for our community and bode well for the future. It is to be hoped that the State Government will get behind and support these forward thinking initiatives in any way possible.

I agree with the Premier as well that our State is already experiencing difficult economic times, but is it any wonder that investors shy away from Tasmania as the recent actions by a member of her own Cabinet show dysfunction within the Labor-Greens alliance. I was actually going to call it a Labor-Greens accord, but I think it is anything but. Really this is what I consider does not bode well for Tasmania. Investors want and need stable government and unity. I find it particularly galling that a member of Cabinet should make statements with regard to forestry contrary to that of the Government. I believe that when one accepts such a revered position, with that position there go certain obligations.

Mr Parkinson - It happens in minority governments.

Mrs ARMITAGE - It is very unfortunate. I think that is one of the things that does not bode well for us. It is important to see the glass is half full, certainly not half empty. We are a land of opportunity and I concur with the Premier that it is time for business to invest and create new jobs. However, as mentioned, it is incumbent upon the Government to show leadership, as continually mentioned by the Premier in her address, and present a united and stable government to encourage this investment. We do not want to lose our young and talented people to other States.

It is all very well to leave Tasmania to further one's education, but we need a State that they want to return to. On a personal note, I have three sons who have moved to Western Australia and currently work in the mining industry. One son has already stated he will never return to Tasmania as he enjoys the west, but currently the other two have every intention of returning to Tasmania eventually. I like to think that we have a State that encourages people to return. There should be no place like home, they should want to come back.

I will touch briefly on Health. The Premier says that along with the Australian Government we are investing half a billion dollars in the new Royal Hobart Hospital. I think it is all very well to create a building; capital works are one thing, but it is the recurrent funding to ensure staffing and the ability to fully utilise these buildings. The Launceston General Hospital is a prime example of this. On the one hand there are massive capital works, including a new emergency department, however with all the beds closed there is limited capacity to take inpatients from this emergency department - not to mention patients on the elective surgery list. I have been told that recently a category 1 surgery was cancelled through lack of a bed. We could get to the stage, as I have been told by some, that categories 2 and 3 could be done in preference to the more urgent category 1 simply because they do not have a bed to do the category 1s. How anyone can believe there are efficiencies in closing beds, and more to the point removing these beds from the hospital to non-sterile, off-site premises, is beyond belief.

As has been mentioned time and time again by many of our doctors, efficiencies are found in treating illness when it occurs rather than letting it deteriorate to a state of emergency that not only has a longer recovery rate and a greater inpatient stay but possibly a higher morbidity rate. We are also at risk of losing several accreditations at the Launceston General Hospital within the next few months due mainly to lack of funding for procedures. These accreditations were hard-won and it is extremely disappointing that they are likely to be lost and it will be next to impossible to get them back.

Private health insurance, or lack of it, particularly with regard to major surgery, such as hip or knee replacements, is a concern and many health insurers are worried that people will join funds for a short time to have required surgery and then leave. This is in effect a hit and run, which will deplete the funds of the health funds and eventually place a greater burden on those who have been there for a long period and remain there.

On a brighter note, tourism does not seem to have had a major downturn and references were made by the Premier to the increase in Asian visitors, and it is certainly apparent in the area where I live. There appear to be not just Asian visitors but many more overseas visitors from a number of countries than in the past and I notice that on a daily occurrence walking past that there really seem to be many overseas visitors, particularly in Launceston.

Having a hotel in the city and close to the strip of motels, we have also noticed the high number of tourists. My partner's hotel opens every day except Christmas Day and paying penalty rates, as has been mentioned by other members, is really of great concern. However, he believes it is important to offer this service even though on occasions there is really doubt whether it is financially viable to open on weekends and public holidays in view of the double and triple time.

I have no doubt that we could have a Tasmania where everyone has the opportunity to realise their full potential and can have the access to services and education they wish, however there are still too many Tasmanians doing it tough. When I was young, which was a long time ago, I have to admit, most people aspired to owning their own home, however now, with the cost of houses compared with wages and expenses it is really hard to see how our young people can own their own homes, unless of course they perhaps go off to the mines or somewhere else and then do they come back? In some areas we have come a long way but in other ways I am really not so sure.

While I respect the Premier and the difficult position she has having, I believe, been handed a somewhat poisoned chalice upon David Bartlett's resignation, there are a lot of weasel words in the 22 pages of the Premier's address such as 'culture of innovation', 'creativity of excellence', 'build on nation-leading social inclusion work'. But what I believe we need is good, solid education, permanent jobs and security. Unemployment is far too high and uncertainty is like a cancer, it spreads.

We need to focus on what we do well and not on the negatives. We have a wonderful State full of opportunities and we need to realise this. Constantly the Premier says all throughout her address, 'if we work together'. Perhaps this address should be required bedtime reading for all Cabinet members. She concludes by saying, 'My Government will continue to provide the strong leadership needed'. I ask the Government to provide that strong leadership and call all ministers to order. Squabbles should be kept in-house, behind closed doors in Cabinet and there must be a united front when they are speaking as part of the Government.

Most people really do not care who is governing provided they are governing well and I, too, like other members call on members of the Government, irrespective of colour - green, red, blue - to put all their differences aside and actually work together for the good of all Tasmanians.